From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ng0 <contact.ng0@cryptolab.net>
Subject: Re: midnight commander package fixes, opinions wanted
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 17:01:23 +0000
Message-ID: <20170301170123.37y4d36dziq6ewqo@abyayala>
References: <20170301165841.ji65zi4rm2pypeql@abyayala>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37710)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <contact.ng0@cryptolab.net>) id 1cj6YU-0004fa-Nj
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 10:52:43 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <contact.ng0@cryptolab.net>) id 1cj6YQ-0004CN-Os
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 10:52:42 -0500
Received: from perdizione.investici.org ([2001:41d0:2:33d0::19]:52004)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <contact.ng0@cryptolab.net>)
	id 1cj6YQ-0004CC-It
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 10:52:38 -0500
Received: from [94.23.50.208] (perdizione [94.23.50.208]) (Authenticated
	sender: niasterisk@grrlz.net) by localhost (Postfix) with
	ESMTPSA id 589FA1201C4
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Wed,  1 Mar 2017 15:52:36 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170301165841.ji65zi4rm2pypeql@abyayala>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: guix-devel@gnu.org

On 17-03-01 16:58:41, ng0 wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I already fixed some of the open issues with our package of 'mc'.
> 
> I think people will expect features to just work and not being broken
> (as they are right now).
> My personal opinion ignored, how do you want to proceed? The vim way
> where we have $package (basic, as small as it gets) and $package-full
> (with all the features you can have enabled)?
> 
> I'd like to hear your opionion so that I can proceed fixing mc with
> what we agreed on.
> 

And also your opinion, I don't know what an opionion is but it sounds
like opium combined with onion and I don't want that.