From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: midnight commander package fixes, opinions wanted Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:58:41 +0000 Message-ID: <20170301165841.ji65zi4rm2pypeql@abyayala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36815) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj6Vx-0004AP-KJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 10:50:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj6Vt-0002yj-M2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 10:50:05 -0500 Received: from perdizione.investici.org ([2001:41d0:2:33d0::19]:49063) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj6Vt-0002yS-CQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 10:50:01 -0500 Received: from [94.23.50.208] (perdizione [94.23.50.208]) (Authenticated sender: niasterisk@grrlz.net) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 215C2121193 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 15:49:59 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi, I already fixed some of the open issues with our package of 'mc'. I think people will expect features to just work and not being broken (as they are right now). My personal opinion ignored, how do you want to proceed? The vim way where we have $package (basic, as small as it gets) and $package-full (with all the features you can have enabled)? I'd like to hear your opionion so that I can proceed fixing mc with what we agreed on.