From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?B?VG9tw6HFoSDEjGVjaA==?= Subject: Re: Memory Usage Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:10:51 +0100 Message-ID: <20170223081051.pomou5qb4m6vofcb@crashnator.suse.cz> References: <20170222195123.arj5tacfjxbkearn@wasp> <194e750715dada0672b63a15b2cfdf2f@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dqbr3otokuz5d73x" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37621) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cgoUR-0004Rf-4B for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 03:11:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cgoUM-0002zp-2L for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 03:11:03 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:37349) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cgoUL-0002ze-Rc for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 03:10:57 -0500 Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F08AABE for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 08:10:54 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <194e750715dada0672b63a15b2cfdf2f@openmailbox.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org --dqbr3otokuz5d73x Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:28:41PM -0800, Rodger Fox wrote: >On 2017-02-22 11:51 am, ng0 wrote: >>On 17-02-22 11:37:11, Rodger Fox wrote: >>>What is the typical memory usage of a GuixSD system? >> >>There's no such thing as a typical system. It depends on what you run, >>300 open browser tabs will lead to more RAM used for example. > >I understand. I didn't mean to leave that as the whole of my question. >I elaborated more on my situation. I have stopped Xorg, networking, >and the guix daemon. I was still at over 5GiB. > >>I'm watching a video, write in an IRC client, and run some other >>background applications and I'm at 3.5 GiB RAM. > >So that seems to confirm my suspicion that something is wrong with my=20 >system. >I am way over that mark with basically nothing running. >As well, I checked another system I have that runs Arch Linux and I=20 >found that >with full gnome-desktop and several extra services running, it is=20 >around 4GiB. > >I was wondering if it was just something strange about the Guix=20 >binaries. >Anyway, I'm just looking for ideas. I know it's a pretty vague problem. >It just makes me wonder if my system is compromised somehow. > >I think I will try a fresh install to see if it changes anything. This is rather high - are you sure that you don't count cache into this? What is in /proc/meminfo? Best regards, S_W --dqbr3otokuz5d73x Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEDOrssfr9jDQthC2PSiPjT6AzQ20FAliumQYACgkQSiPjT6Az Q23DsA//bikO/VVZr0vXqU6eWkg2PTEbx8rMF04GOsEZLxUU4BsPQYBAYR2TmPrI YNaVzVTfaaLN+b+34Jvi7k8u+Dk4bjxsTymYIVlM9TLfC2Bke4pAdmk/5/ntPY6q KfneKIusb7O/kuArZ29S0bZ7VpJ4axtuFuE1XquuF+2pGvpSUk6wT1IfbZgt2dYN t2UVTYT6i1+71FvabcGArZtKDGniKqvfsiZK0N+PT55QtzIeCw/YPDAj4BUixL6M oux/XWV8oB3/VeRRtB025R/jMCRR7cvONHrfB9cZZLxvtgFrHRuKafQv92gOTouB Zq0FW7fSI85XsAA0AK+OTIQ8yRmXkaxoKGY0gAK75VkRQmfYcjhG25zdMPIKC8YD /Oa57FNeHGrLv84ge1IlLAcPud9FSetfol0VIGWq++ISrqx9W0MF5cYfwa666wyn L8TA3nziiG8QOTbc9VV5p14p+XJGAFSGEmCRp1D+66vyRfLY25youhAYP5iB4eDO xRWvzM5VIXgpGVrDw768QZxO+o3b2BE7JOtksokdlwlcJPF/lmHRYX+xOaKPomZ4 JCNxkMNKX+MleGXErh+vFe0da5xDIB6JTdfKrYURqFL8lCUIV0nLXL1LFkIskXWR 1br4l8AlLUTehQ/+opCjgg/5R9kiuqYq4wkqsyZcxQrjfAsUYS0= =eg74 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dqbr3otokuz5d73x--