From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add pybitmessage, [PATCH] gnu: Add python2-pyqt-4, [PAT Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 20:14:58 +0000 Message-ID: <20170217201458.3gu7lxuivjexte7q@wasp> References: <20170216163803.GA12299@mutt.economicsofbitcoin.com> <20170217110502.GC8688@mutt.economicsofbitcoin.com> <20170217162534.GD8688@mutt.economicsofbitcoin.com> <20170217164131.qqcv5mzvmihg6agi@wasp> <20170217171924.GE8688@mutt.economicsofbitcoin.com> <20170217175305.toysiwg5fzog54xc@wasp> <20170217193321.GF8688@mutt.economicsofbitcoin.com> <20170217194026.lpuh45lv2xk2nmbq@wasp> <20170217200627.GG8688@mutt.economicsofbitcoin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48350) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ceou8-0004DO-5m for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 15:13:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ceou4-0007yQ-2n for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 15:13:20 -0500 Received: from fragranza.investici.org ([178.175.144.26]:64690) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ceou3-0007uv-Mz for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 15:13:16 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170217200627.GG8688@mutt.economicsofbitcoin.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Peter =?utf-8?B?xaB1cmRh?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, chicks@getbackinthe.kitchen On 17-02-17 21:06:27, Peter =C5=A0urda wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 07:40:26PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > I think you are trying to do to much, to be honest. Leave the job of > > system integration up to the people who are familar with the systems. > Based on my experience, without instructions, they often don't do it > correctly. They miss some of the dependencies which then results in > disabled features and then I have to deal with that. That's the purpose > of the wiki page linked earlier. >=20 > > We have the guix package already, no point in trying to re-invent it. > > Gentoo packagers know best what to do for Gentoo, same for Debian, th= e > > BSD folks, etc. No idea about Windows and OSX. > > What I tried to communicate here was, the instructions might be wrong > > and misleading. You didn't respond to my question, so I'll just leave > > you with this. > I guess I don't understand what you're looking for then. >=20 > --=20 > Peter =C5=A0urda > Bitmessage core developer What I tried to tell you in the previous message: Personally I'm done wit= h this conversation, and I hope you don't repeat what happened last year and we can just do useful things with our time instead of arguing. Thanks. --=20 ng0 -- https://www.inventati.org/patternsinthechaos/