From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter =?utf-8?B?xaB1cmRh?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add pybitmessage, [PATCH] gnu: Add python2-pyqt-4, [PAT Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 21:06:27 +0100 Message-ID: <20170217200627.GG8688@mutt.economicsofbitcoin.com> References: <20170216163803.GA12299@mutt.economicsofbitcoin.com> <20170217110502.GC8688@mutt.economicsofbitcoin.com> <20170217162534.GD8688@mutt.economicsofbitcoin.com> <20170217164131.qqcv5mzvmihg6agi@wasp> <20170217171924.GE8688@mutt.economicsofbitcoin.com> <20170217175305.toysiwg5fzog54xc@wasp> <20170217193321.GF8688@mutt.economicsofbitcoin.com> <20170217194026.lpuh45lv2xk2nmbq@wasp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46740) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ceonc-0006ph-8B for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 15:06:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ceonX-0003f9-7H for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 15:06:36 -0500 Received: from [2a01:4f8:192:db::2] (port=45433 helo=anarchy.economicsofbitcoin.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ceonX-0003eo-10 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 15:06:31 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170217194026.lpuh45lv2xk2nmbq@wasp> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org, chicks@getbackinthe.kitchen, ng0 On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 07:40:26PM +0000, ng0 wrote: >I think you are trying to do to much, to be honest. Leave the job of >system integration up to the people who are familar with the systems. Based on my experience, without instructions, they often don't do it correctly. They miss some of the dependencies which then results in disabled features and then I have to deal with that. That's the purpose of the wiki page linked earlier. >We have the guix package already, no point in trying to re-invent it. >Gentoo packagers know best what to do for Gentoo, same for Debian, the >BSD folks, etc. No idea about Windows and OSX. >What I tried to communicate here was, the instructions might be wrong >and misleading. You didn't respond to my question, so I'll just leave >you with this. I guess I don't understand what you're looking for then. --=20 Peter =C5=A0urda Bitmessage core developer