On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 07:24:17PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> This 'extra' is a time-saving kludge. I'll add fields for all of
> agetty's configuration options once I'm satisfied that the service works
> on GuixSD.

Here's a patch that exposes (almost all) of agetty's command-line
options.

Is this the right way? Or would we rather wrap only the most
commonly-used options, and leave an "escape hatch" as in the first
version of the patch? If so, which options should we expose in Scheme?

I'll wait for feedback before writing the documentation.