* hash of fish is wrong.
@ 2017-02-14 17:19 ng0
2017-02-14 19:14 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: ng0 @ 2017-02-14 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel
Hi,
can someone else check which hash should be the correct one?
master tree of guix gives:
ng0@greendragon ~/src/guix-dev$ guix package -i fish
Starting download of /gnu/store/a44p5qn1idsy75qfgky7l3ksjjrxqmca-fish-2.5.0.tar.gz
From https://fishshell.com/files/2.5.0/fish-2.5.0.tar.gz...
....0.tar.gz 3.3MiB 1.2MiB/s 00:03 [####################] 100.0%
output path `/gnu/store/a44p5qn1idsy75qfgky7l3ksjjrxqmca-fish-2.5.0.tar.gz' should have sha256 hash `0kn2n9qr9cksg2cl78f3w0yd24368d35djhi6w5x3gbdxk23ywq3', instead has `19djav128nkhjxgfhwhc32i5y9d9c3karbh5yg67kqrdranyvh7q'
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/01z7y3zp19g6jbniql2jm8kh11cjsl4c-fish-2.5.0.tar.xz.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/0j2l71rak7676qh7015mk80ib3j418p9-fish-2.5.0.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
guix package: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/0j2l71rak7676qh7015mk80ib3j418p9-fish-2.5.0.drv' failed
A download from that url above gives me:
ng0@wasp ~/r/tarballs> torify wget https://fishshell.com/files/2.5.0/fish-2.5.0.tar.gz
--2017-02-14 17:16:04-- https://fishshell.com/files/2.5.0/fish-2.5.0.tar.gz
Resolving fishshell.com... 54.192.28.95
Connecting to fishshell.com|54.192.28.95|:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 3496831 (3.3M) [application/x-gzip]
Saving to: ‘fish-2.5.0.tar.gz’
fish-2.5.0.tar.gz 100%[===================>] 3.33M 246KB/s in 14s
2017-02-14 17:16:21 (251 KB/s) - ‘fish-2.5.0.tar.gz’ saved [3496831/3496831]
ng0@wasp ~/r/tarballs> guix hash fish-2.5.0.tar.gz
19djav128nkhjxgfhwhc32i5y9d9c3karbh5yg67kqrdranyvh7q
I think 19djav128nkhjxgfhwhc32i5y9d9c3karbh5yg67kqrdranyvh7q is correct.
--
ng0 -- https://www.inventati.org/patternsinthechaos/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: hash of fish is wrong.
2017-02-14 17:19 hash of fish is wrong ng0
@ 2017-02-14 19:14 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
2017-02-14 19:27 ` Leo Famulari
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice @ 2017-02-14 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: contact.ng0; +Cc: guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1219 bytes --]
ng0 (again, and this time the list),
Thanks for catching and reporting this.
On 14/02/17 18:19, ng0 wrote:
> can someone else check which hash should be the correct one? I think
> 19djav128nkhjxgfhwhc32i5y9d9c3karbh5yg67kqrdranyvh7q is correct.
We're both right! Yay! It's a Valentine's day miracle:
$ ~/guix/pre-inst-env guix hash /gnu/store/*-fish-2.5.0.tar.gz
0kn2n9qr9cksg2cl78f3w0yd24368d35djhi6w5x3gbdxk23ywq3
$ boring-old-wget https://fishshell.com/files/2.5.0/fish-2.5.0.tar.gz
$ guix hash fish-2.5.0.tar.gz
19djav128nkhjxgfhwhc32i5y9d9c3karbh5yg67kqrdranyvh7q
Hm. Did I mis-label an old fish-2.4.0 tarball by mistake when updating?
Nope:
$ tar tf /gnu/store/*-fish-2.5.0.tar.gz | head -n1
fish-shell-2.5.0/
$ tar tf ~/fish-2.5.0.tar.gz | head -n1
fish-2.5.0/
What the—
Once again, hashing all the things catches a sneaky upstream
dirty-handed. The original fish-2.5.0.tar.gz lacked a configure script
(see commit 89eb56f05fa1561b09d1050147d968b98a16b07a). Apparently, the
way to fix that is by silently replacing your tarball in-place.
Anyone want to scan a 20,357-line diff for a back door before I push an
update?
Kind regards,
T G-R
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 476 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: hash of fish is wrong.
2017-02-14 19:14 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
@ 2017-02-14 19:27 ` Leo Famulari
2017-02-14 19:29 ` Leo Famulari
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Leo Famulari @ 2017-02-14 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice; +Cc: guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 211 bytes --]
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 08:14:43PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> Anyone want to scan a 20,357-line diff for a back door before I push an
> update?
We should file a bug report with the fish maintainers.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: hash of fish is wrong.
2017-02-14 19:27 ` Leo Famulari
@ 2017-02-14 19:29 ` Leo Famulari
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Leo Famulari @ 2017-02-14 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice; +Cc: guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 378 bytes --]
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 02:27:00PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 08:14:43PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> > Anyone want to scan a 20,357-line diff for a back door before I push an
> > update?
>
> We should file a bug report with the fish maintainers.
Somebody else already did it:
https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/issues/3807
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-14 19:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-14 17:19 hash of fish is wrong ng0
2017-02-14 19:14 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
2017-02-14 19:27 ` Leo Famulari
2017-02-14 19:29 ` Leo Famulari
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.