From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ng0 <contact.ng0@cryptolab.net>
Subject: Re: Add murmur.
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:00:46 +0000
Message-ID: <20170214090046.mduhp3jyhgn7gzrc@wasp>
References: <20170201204312.3005-1-contact.ng0@cryptolab.net>
	<87mvdvxq9v.fsf@gnu.org> <20170209182030.ngn2dsdfbzsmymdj@wasp>
	<87efz7asit.fsf@gnu.org> <20170210213959.on6psfta6jcbjv2b@wasp>
	<877f4x1zle.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<20170210221536.iv5rktzx43b6xddv@wasp> <87wpcw3iks.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20170211143934.oo5loexp4pbpovpk@wasp> <87y3xbwmvi.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46166)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <contact.ng0@cryptolab.net>) id 1cdYwy-0002ns-C9
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 03:59:05 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <contact.ng0@cryptolab.net>) id 1cdYwt-0003NB-KI
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 03:59:04 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87y3xbwmvi.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On 17-02-12 14:37:53, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
> ng0 <contact.ng0@cryptolab.net> skribis:
>=20
> > On 17-02-11 15:31:15, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
> >> ng0 <contact.ng0@cryptolab.net> skribis:
>=20
> [...]
>=20
> >> > As far as I know right now, it does not have any graphical feature=
s or
> >> > dependencies.
> >> >
> >> > mumble:murmur -> total: 1072.6 MiB
> >> > mumble:out    -> total: 1111.2 MiB
> >>=20
> >> And what about the total reported by
> >>=20
> >>   guix size mumble:murmur mumble:out
>=20
> [...]
>=20
> > store item                                                       tota=
l    self
> > /gnu/store/1zdk5x87ig5zvqcn5f8lllnmrywg9asa-mumble-1.2.19         111=
1.2     5.6   0.5%
> > /gnu/store/l4as1725kds2rrpz2l1pcfz8bjn256qd-mumble-1.2.19-murmur  107=
2.6     1.2   0.1%
>=20
> [...]
>=20
> > total: 1112.3 MiB
>=20
> For 1.2 MiB, I=E2=80=99d say keep both in the same output.
>=20
> Could you update the patch accordingly?
>=20
> Thank you!
>=20
> Ludo=E2=80=99.
>=20

I will take the shortcut here and sent the updated patch with just "out"
as output (to the nex guix-patches@ list), but I want to continue
the discussion around client/server
separation as I think it's worth for some outcome. Even if it's just to
document why Guix is safe when everything is combined :)

--=20
ng0 -- https://www.inventati.org/patternsinthechaos/