Re: Commits signed by key not registered on Savannah

[ng0 <contact.ng0@cryptolab.net>]

On 17-02-12 00:41:38, David Craven wrote:
> > It might be nice to associate with each committer, a list of all keys
> > that they have ever used to sign commits in our git repository.
> 
> > Keys would be added to the list over time, but never removed.
> 
> Sounds good. Where would we put that list? And does that list also

Would the git repository, or a new git repository (guix-keys.git?) be a
bad idea? Best case, we craft something which serves as an GNUPG_HOME
for the keys which then live in the keyring of this thing (compare to
gentoo-keys, debian-keys, etc).

> need to be signed? Puh, lucky for me I don't have to be responsible
> for that key =P
> 
> For now my public keys are published on mit.edu, so they shouldn't be lost
> and can be retrieved when this list materializes.
> 
> >  The conventional usage of Savannah's ssh key registry is to include only
> > currently active keys, and that's needed as well.
> 
> I updated the key.
> 

-- 
ng0 -- https://www.inventati.org/patternsinthechaos/