From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: GuixSD on commodity hosting platforms, hoster: IN-Berlin Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:59:51 +0000 Message-ID: <20170210225951.gq5k372g4jehbvk5@wasp> References: <20170209183609.5rztohnqhsleifll@wasp> <87wpczumkc.fsf@gnu.org> <20170210224834.e7c4ud3ttc5aasfy@wasp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59904) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccK8s-0001Ok-4A for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 17:58:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccK8o-0004i0-Gm for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 17:58:14 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170210224834.e7c4ud3ttc5aasfy@wasp> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen , guix-devel@gnu.org On 17-02-10 22:48:34, ng0 wrote: > On 17-02-09 21:38:27, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > ng0 writes: > >=20 > > > It turns out that it could be as simple as providing them with the = raw > > > disk image, so I will give it a try soon. > >=20 > > Can you share the config.scm of that? >=20 > What do you mean? I will just test generally if it works on their > infrastructure. Afterwards I will set up some services for myself to > have something to test the server side of things I build and package. > There will be no public config to share, only at some point afterwards > when I decide to share a stripped down config or set of configs. >=20 > In the long run it would be nice if IN-Berlin could offer GuixSD in > addition to Debian, but as we all know, there's a reason for the "beta" > and until it's marked as beta I won't get to this point of discussion. > Just a general check if it works. The way it works for the current > Debian setup, asking for GuixSD would be no problem. No problem with a > raw image, so for them it won't matter if there'll be an .iso later on. >=20 > I used IN-Berlin before, started when I offered OpenNIC resolvers and a > tor-relay, and more afterwards. For users based in Germany I can > recommend it. I say Germany, because I have no idea if their registry > system would work well for anyone not living in Germany, I don't even > know about Austria. In case anyone is interested, asking via email will > resolve questions. >=20 >=20 > >=20 > > > Is anyone interested in the documentation or success of this experi= ment? > >=20 > > On the future of Guix-panel it was said (by Ludo'?) that getting Guix= SD > > on a mainstream hosting platform was very good to have. Adding to the last reply: I think with mainstream platform something like AWS and some other cloud server solutions were targeted. My idea is just IN-Berlin, afterwards I'm done with the topic for myself for now, I have no intention to push this any further. > >=20 > > I'm interested in how this goes and would like to try the gentle folk= s > > of An Meais=C3=ADn D=C3=A9n=C3=A1rtha (https://anmd.org) if that is u= seful. > >=20 > > Greetings, > > --janneke > >=20 > > --=20 > > Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.or= g > > Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE http://AvatarAcad= emy.nl =20 > >=20 >=20 > --=20 > ng0 -- https://www.inventati.org/patternsinthechaos/ >=20 --=20 ng0 -- https://www.inventati.org/patternsinthechaos/