From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: 01/01: gnu: cups-filters: Update to 1.11.5. Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:06:19 -0500 Message-ID: <20170115190619.GB29718@jasmine> References: <20161029230841.27311.65622@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <20161029230842.0AC4822011A@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0lnxQi9hkpPO77W3" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44256) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSq8I-0004k7-7H for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:06:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSq8E-0005Sf-1R for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:06:26 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:59127) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSq8D-0005ST-TJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:06:21 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161029230842.0AC4822011A@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org --0lnxQi9hkpPO77W3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 11:08:42PM +0000, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: Hi Tobias! > nckx pushed a commit to branch core-updates > in repository guix. >=20 > commit 4ab016e0ab9bfff2f108d1fc6f0ed3b0e1eff735 > Author: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice > Date: Sun Oct 30 00:07:08 2016 +0200 >=20 > gnu: cups-filters: Update to 1.11.5. > =20 > * gnu/packages/cups.scm (cups-filters): Update to 1.11.5. > [arguments]: Add =E2=80=98--with-gs-path=3D=E2=80=99 to #:configure-f= lags. > [inputs]: Add mupdf. I wonder, do you have a use for the "mutool" integration that this enabled, or did you add it simply because the configure phase fails without it? If the latter, I think we should instead pass '--disable-mutool', so that cups-filters doesn't depend on two different PDF libraries. Otherwise, we should make cups-filters refer directly to mupdf's mutool, instead of looking for it on PATH. Your thoughts? --0lnxQi9hkpPO77W3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlh7yCsACgkQJkb6MLrK fwjYfg/9HnxCF/ZzehqJib/jX+Z/+KcZboP7F1Eu2iWTnMrJ/3iUtSiJmiVYBpWy QG4iIMCiU3nKmxMaijo06wFcldmrcnpTfFtHCR6NP5OcRsR+ptstHEDl2NfqbPr6 dhoOuhNKL+Qa0hn0v5tsKWdyY0w8DeITAQ9A/CSJiPePX6GYEQxdxzSA0iqSHOKA /HeVLPcEuU0ZF0T21QGCes9lr53vTtm/Cz1ZMO4ZMAkGom29rp7rGrOUVPiaqy5B Ji9dYO1Y4M4FnkFtw7YJPU85+nCoPel09gvtXboVq6+KXvptetl/onhyP9o1L9RE cy/tf6td78cGi5P6HmfLd1O2DiaeCnOg5Zx079EhPEsArK1c54hYff7GzZAJFLpc DPuz8zeL5RK2liwiwQehPcbFCSwxZGJVM+UcyuomO0m0japiY6TgMVkOXlsMS4Dj D3mwvCu0/UI8yOfJ9zxm+r3EcR/6O5QUMhumEzJv7gDwhSoK5n+QgOGNNoF+kiGd eXG8RN7dKEZ6O1rTCHS0Wv7pko6FfCi6PEpCkpCbQUc/JRJo1/4KXSIvp6vAe/bs ClCSHJ4241Nr5X9oJc59Ui1LVyWONYApfOjTMjorrrCZo9ar25pYdaDITxShvHjD VWvpRtHoqBJOSIsG5d1RXLTSvbStRRWtYvFZDWTKlavPJBBjWRQ= =z6m8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0lnxQi9hkpPO77W3--