From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add inox. Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:16:55 -0500 Message-ID: <20170110191655.GA379@jasmine> References: <20170110120856.17190-1-david@craven.ch> <20170110190214.GA31184@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59077) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cR1ut-0007Qe-G3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:17:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cR1uo-0005ip-Eo for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:17:07 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:38864) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cR1uo-0005i3-8P for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:17:02 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: David Craven Cc: guix-devel On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 08:08:59PM +0100, David Craven wrote: > > Wow! > > Don't get too excited yet... :) > > >> NOTE: Builds 6634/18623. > > > What does this note mean? > > That it only builds to a third. Ah, I see. > guix download https://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/chromium-browser-official/chromium-53.0.2785.101.tar.xz > warning: failed to install locale: Invalid argument > > Starting download of /tmp/guix-file.ZlNMAP > From https://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/chromium-browser-official/chromium-53.0.2785.101.tar.xz... > ...2785.101.tar.xz 439.5MiB 11.7MiB/s 00:37 > [####################] 100.0% > /gnu/store/7b62sh72p4i4c5c9xzvqycr2mmj33kqh-chromium-53.0.2785.101.tar.xz > 1q5fqhsnfv1485f16dbxc1f0biynv37qkvimpr8l41hi9gbmxigd > > Mmh, what does this mean? I think it was a transient network error. After a few tries (!) I got the tarball described by the hash.