From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dian_cecht@zoho.com Subject: bug#25278: Acknowledgement (Possible virus found in icecat-45.5.1) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 17:41:36 -0800 Message-ID: <20161227014136.GA21067@khaalida> References: <20161226191835.GA15226@khaalida> <20161226201112.GA17281@khaalida> <20161226235750.GA23698@jasmine> <20161227002047.GA19923@khaalida> <20161227012415.GA14310@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49334) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cLgmE-0005vH-13 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 20:42:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cLgmA-0000Gh-UF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 20:42:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40783) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cLgmA-0000Gb-R2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 20:42:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cLgmA-0006CV-Lr for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 20:42:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161227012415.GA14310@jasmine> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 25278-done@debbugs.gnu.org On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 08:24:15PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 04:20:47PM -0800, dian_cecht@zoho.com wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 06:57:50PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 12:11:13PM -0800, dian_cecht@zoho.com wrote: > > > > I just wanted to add that I went ahead and ran icecat-45.5.1 then rescanned > > > > ~/.mozilla and nothing related to the virus popped up with the scan. > > > > > > Are the files with the same SHA1 hashes still present? > > > > So I rechecked the files listed in this bugreport and yes, the checksums are the > > same. However, they no longer list as viruses according to ClamAV. I checked my > > logs and I'm assuming that a database update fixed a false positive (freshclam > > updates the database every 2 hours on my machine, and, afaik, the virus > > definition was added in the last day or two). > > > > So it looks to me like it was simply a false positive. > > Good news! > > You can close the bug by sending a message to > <25278-done@debbugs.gnu.org>. Good to know. Thanks.