From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: pius: Update to 2.2.2-0.891687c. Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 15:02:30 -0500 Message-ID: <20161225200230.GA29608@jasmine> References: <148269199943.2068.14760851879049354797@what> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52303) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cLF07-0003d4-DW for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 15:02:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cLF04-0005QI-8W for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 15:02:35 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:33673) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cLF04-0005QA-4d for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 15:02:32 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <148269199943.2068.14760851879049354797@what> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Troy Sankey Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 01:53:19PM -0500, Troy Sankey wrote: > Attached is a patch to upgrade pius to a version that works with > gpg-agent 2.1, in my experience. I have tested this version with > gnupg@2.1.17 as the gpg input and gpg-agent version, and using a new > style keybox (pubring.kbx) file as the keyring. >=20 > This also effectively reverts commit 31fbf4b6: >=20 > "gnu: pius: Depend on GnuPG 2.0 rather than 2.1." >=20 > Another thread in guix-devel [0] suggests that pius could not deal with > gpg-agent 2.1 which is why it may have been configured to use gnupg-2.0. > The attached patch brings support for 2.1, so I think I am also allowed > to revert 31fbf4b6. >=20 > Note, however, the code comment describes a different concern: >=20 > > - ("gpg" ,gnupg-2.0))) ;2.1 fails to talk to gpg-a= gent 2.0 >=20 > I have yet to test gpg/gpgme 2.1 with gpg-agent 2.0, mostly due to the > fact that gnupg 2.0 and 2.1 keep/expect agent sockets in completely > different directories. I tried a couple of things and lost my patience. > I do not understand how gpg 2.1 can talk to gpg-agent 2.0 without weird > hackery. >=20 > This version installs from git because it has been 20 days since my > request to bump the version [1], and I got impatient. >=20 > Troy >=20 > [0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-08/msg01885.html > [1] https://github.com/jaymzh/pius/issues/46 > From 581ff5477ad7dd0d58550ffcfa68116873a1a1bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Troy Sankey > Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 22:53:07 -0500 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: pius: Update to 2.2.2-0.891687c. >=20 > * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (pius): Update to 2.2.2-0.891687c. > [inputs]: Change GNUPG-2.0 to GNUPG (2.1). Thanks, this change LGTM. I think we should start trying to move away from any dependencies on GnuPG 2.0, since it will be retired in ~12 months: "There are two major flavours of GnuPG: 2.1.17 is the modern version with support for ECC and many other new featur= es, 2.0.30 is the stable version from an often used branch. This branch will reach end-of-life on 2017-12-31." source: https://www.gnupg.org/index.html I'll look more closely in the next couple days and push if there is no more feedback. --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlhgJdYACgkQJkb6MLrK fwh4SA//frYYVq3SW/BWwciLT9d9DWv1MOJzkoi/uCNPfNOck3igOESlQWu3vBN+ N7iBJpzX+BgCXRE4XYB4N4nq7rdaecMd81uCE6Yy5di/a/RbpDp2nJamlO1yvh6W On+8eATLVLmyzrYoV0OoH+zcII1lt5Sp85YgMyRnfz9D7CRgMeBnw7f2V9T5PCAd 3PrUNgYnGmO3Aa4TEU5GsEdUYrj/m4RhUzMMm+Ke73YpimwRxKKOmP2ZmWHDlQ0t D4enOyPez8U4mVmbhFDJ4Ii0XgixkPoTPJxHKLa/v4ACFO6JPnal5pXFbkGSKUOZ qWtxznFBrvR6i4iKIV2Bw6Ty1MuuZTlwb5WmGCOb5ERePZ+bZLvspp5S/Cj+daXi cxWpK0kz1LqLu4RHqsseHvzqwD3QnOynwGAVWhG1CynNcrqbei/L95pbS8zlm+7B ikfW4MVhsDEqoWQhrbNxy1q7yL+eY726heHtQGQ1yMcme74+FDppa7F3fnNe1l38 O9wFwlMjWvsrFBNDZCwtokTGbqtBuxcbhjN20wZ7GWMoMgJg0+X6F8R7JCX+R2Wg 5GUa6ha94Q9+nMznH98jd7UTY6X96QcdWEBCxinDR9U6/4gWLQTFijCShFrq1eTk JC0M84fqdFl3RZBlluj1gOUMkL6lsH7vZ0xCFuIgFTSfvEpanSw= =SoZa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3--