From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Time to build =?utf-8?B?4oCYc3RhZ2lu?= =?utf-8?B?Z+KAmSE=?= Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 15:03:08 -0500 Message-ID: <20161211200308.GE20766@jasmine> References: <87wpff7le8.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg1nbq6f.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20161204181134.GB2892@jasmine> <87y3zm1f86.fsf@gnu.org> <87h96a9sbq.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55734) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cGAL7-0005h9-NN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 15:03:19 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cGAL4-0001eP-Ij for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 15:03:17 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h96a9sbq.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 02:30:33PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > > > Leo Famulari skribis: > > > >> On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 05:43:36PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > >>> Ludovic Courtès writes: > >>> > >>> > Hi Guix! > >>> > > >>> > It’s time to merge master into staging and build it! > >>> > > >>> > Leo, Marius: thoughts? Since you’re the one who did most of the work > >>> > there, I suggest that you do this (Leo has access to Hydra). > >>> > >>> I just did a master merge and picked the mupdf update. I think it's good > >>> to go! :-) > >> > >> I've created a staging jobset and asked Hydra to evaluate it: > >> > >> https://hydra.gnu.org/jobset/gnu/staging > > > > It would seem to be ready to merge: > > > > https://hydra.gnu.org/eval/109391?compare=master#tabs-now-fail > > > > The few remaining failures on x86_64 seem to be transient. There are > > more failures on mips, part of which is due to massive test failures in > > Subversion (see > > ), which look > > fishy. > > > > I’d be in favor of merging now though. > > > > What do people think? > > Sounds fine to me. Okay, shall I go ahead and do it?