From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pjotr Prins Subject: Re: Why don't we have "Guix channels"? Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 10:09:55 +0000 Message-ID: <20161209100955.GA9296@mail.thebird.nl> References: <87y3zptva4.fsf@gmail.com> <87twadtv04.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52187) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFIAB-0000Yo-3m for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 05:12:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFIA6-00012M-BS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 05:12:23 -0500 Received: from mail.thebird.nl ([95.154.246.10]:35961) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFIA6-0000wm-4s for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 05:12:18 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87twadtv04.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Chris Marusich Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:35:39PM -0800, Chris Marusich wrote: > Apologies for the self-reply, but I wanted to point out that it seems > "channels" were actually mentioned here as a possible future direction > for "guix pull": > > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22629 > > Still, I'm curious to hear what others think about it. Guix channels is high on our list of priorities. So far, no one has found time to work on it properly. Pj.