From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: Preparing for 0.12.0
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:46:22 -0500
Message-ID: <20161130204622.GB11793@jasmine>
References: <87twapkugs.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87d1hdt7u9.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<20161130162747.GA8341@jasmine>
	<878ts0uae8.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60521)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1cCBlv-00029k-55
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:46:33 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1cCBls-0004o8-4l
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:46:31 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <878ts0uae8.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org


--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 06:48:15PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
> >> A quick grep for 'replacement' digs up these grafts:
> >>=20
> >> * cairo      (1059 rebuilds)
> >> * curl       (1356 rebuilds)
> >> * cyrus-sasl (1360 rebuilds)
> >> * dbus       (1187 rebuilds)
> >> * guile@2.0  (1457 rebuilds)
> >> * libtiff    (1672 rebuilds)
> >> * libxslt    (2765 rebuilds)
> >> * pixman     (1061 rebuilds)
> >> * ruby       (344 rebuilds)
> >>=20
> >> There is probably a fair bit of overlap between cairo, dbus and pixman.
> >> Are these OK for staging? Ruby is an obvious candidate, I'll do that.
> >
> > I think it's okay to ungraft those packages on staging. Thanks Marius!
>=20
> Done! I took the liberty of merging 'master' as well to get the recent
> cairo graft. Luckily no conflicts. Also updated dbus to the latest
> stable '1.10.14' (from 1.10.12).
>=20
> Apparently ruby was already ungrafted.

Thank you!

--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlg/OpoACgkQJkb6MLrK
fwj8ZxAAsjwzukhUewsyZ+XJfSAPG2bRhdJBq+tnux4iaV6PkQp0yhWzjB5y+vNj
EIe+oaWShxJvVt6LhQoPenRQa4OiNQ6WgrP/GcC4FcrZNlx1rAC/VdYCWItnkqpt
p4cYGHRVj4zfll98nue7DjwyzEjUP0EYsQQD4aCOc14GdWkFYiczbGQcu2moCBWo
uKnDs38cbkm9yVZkTQ85czmvoKdbKQrXeEtm6e/HBcYGzBzHq3Yqex1lrg28u6Z5
rYhEaGe0JETU1xcxZkeNlZFmwBWKJGua22dO3DDUyfyihSPt1Lh34MLOoyEAOrfL
ItNz9f3plHH+nQZ4I/NxGMHz//kQP0y+CyhYn4cFuXmu1r4wQqMUU6wGD+LrduAO
nWsatoh5IAiw4m34GYVOojBCX7CFye6GXVs7IN324fivyD+V8VCk6KJQJfJXAKJk
67YW5uoPWTOOVWNcUJiTvn9unJwVhiUShPHGNvcb4ONTWR2oHqej6pZsOCCLtqWx
8tfptFAxEpdEPzRq2tVylZq5YuHgohaIkbib58XQQsQ00akxYUygJh6+bIyNvwvg
scimmXWzi64yX8a57tfpnoBqwVW3m3RAH/qqRkFq4IXXa6ZMRXY68Pgndec9D0nc
QN1v+XR8OUgTI6WDDcpTg69knTMT1xMBbd5EVPBkYKfKCkTLuxI=
=Kq3m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc--