From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Libarchive 3.2.2 update Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 21:20:57 -0500 Message-ID: <20161129022057.GA21607@jasmine> References: <87vav7btcr.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33847) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cBY2Y-0000lu-6X for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 21:21:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cBY2V-0002T3-0C for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 21:21:02 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87vav7btcr.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 02:56:52PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Leo Famulari skribis: > > > This patch updates libarchive to 3.2.2. Besides integrating our bug-fix > > patches, this release fixes some other bugs, too: > > > > https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/compare/v3.2.1...v3.2.2 > > > > It's a little more than we want to do on staging... > > > > Building the following 551 packages would ensure 1222 dependent packages > > are rebuilt > > If there are no known security issues fixed, could this go to > ‘core-updates’? WDYT? None that I know of, but I'm not an expert. I think that there are a lot of people are paying attention to libarchive at the moment, so hopefully the bugs will be publicized if necessary. > The patch LGTM. I pushed it to core-updates after fixing a thinko in one of the patches (wrong URL to the libarchive bug tracker). I figured we might as well have the right URL somewhere in `git log`.