From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] gnu: python-flask: Update to 0.11.1. Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 10:24:14 -0500 Message-ID: <20161127152414.GA28396@jasmine> References: <20161126135122.3906-1-dannym@scratchpost.org> <20161126135122.3906-4-dannym@scratchpost.org> <20161127052718.GA11365@jasmine> <87polhf6tm.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42744) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cB1JU-0007Qu-T7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 10:24:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cB1JQ-0004GH-S7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 10:24:20 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:54897) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cB1JQ-0004Fh-OH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 10:24:16 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87polhf6tm.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 01:25:25PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > error: Could not find suitable distribution for Requirement.parse('clic= k>=3D2.0') > > phase `check' failed after 0.2 seconds > > builder for `/gnu/store/mrm59ipqv4kknmq1n2bm0dxfjcbggs08-python2-flask-= 0.11.1.drv' failed with exit code 1 >=20 > I picked Dannys latest commit which fixed this. Thanks! > However it does seem to skip the tests entirely: >=20 > starting phase `check' > running "python setup.py" with command "test" and parameters () > running test > phase `check' succeeded after 0.1 seconds I guess it must be doing *something* if it was looking for click and failing previously. But, I think this is similar to the issue whereby many test suites were silently skipped with Python 3.4. We could try invoking them manually. At least, it looks the same in the build log. --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlg6+poACgkQJkb6MLrK fwg5CRAAmlpUsWnXb0WOZeskrlPxcwvp02tNrGrrIZdc0pYTpY3apc6p7iyFrl7Y 6aIgtU42Yw4WLrrgKvb+G+kgNYfWps3v1TX8YLaOZIDbGZkaR5/GbRFUcQadKB/w 7bgN6LQ30b8UzSy5cpCZOZJoSTUuqqqmINQ6ePP8RN1RfiJcZ4mMz5Qx/QJ6uV5p 1bk+PLFa81JUObi70iAU+kPSykZy6obWEM8KiAXyzSffch3ETV2hVcbkY6oR1yIb vREAmHwmXHtKfWROqX0d0+0doxDNkXzNsN3iWUbJtKcJHVods1Ni6YUywcFXuvEK kIPA5Tcu4qcZJaPiD1Ewowea1Z7BmXBvUVjuXQrt6/2x1cFWENCbMNSjSjS+mj9O 2YxeMyrFb0WqhDFNhXS84K1PF3bQKc0VdqUDIuhikQz5CbmG0I0/gfdArOHJbHN2 Joc+sj/yD+6b3A+q0WqH5LLfXAqvpspr5lM57qhC4fqRUrmWAzOtsdEvie8QtJt/ /8BS/qZuiL2KeUpHhXqZzWGMRwBODLJYsT8Zid0YBokzYcUZUCXCF0qNE8BqGMFh hdnJPqr6zlR4nijAFSTLqR2bhew4gvSiDTi0Wy1I7y02BMZAgFS+A00Q3P/77+CH Y0WkvPJwioXQhoownFx10IJDN6A0H+mlf8/dBteV4Ur5QPWFdIk= =DVKk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM--