From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: [PATCH] Fix GCJ on armhf. Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 22:35:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20161125213515.14677-1-rekado@elephly.net> Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45594) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAO9b-0001n2-GT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 16:35:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAO9W-0002Mk-EK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 16:35:31 -0500 Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:21322) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAO9W-0002Lk-47 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 16:35:26 -0500 List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi Guix, with (a poorly formatted variant of) the attached patch I've built GCJ successfully in an ARM virtual machine. Building GCJ took about four days. I tested GCJ by building "ant", which seemed to have worked fine. ~~ Ricardo Ricardo Wurmus (1): gnu: gcj: Fix build on armhf. gnu/local.mk | 1 + gnu/packages/gcc.scm | 14 +++++++++++++ gnu/packages/patches/gcj-arm-mode.patch | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/gcj-arm-mode.patch -- 2.10.2