From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Libtiff 4.0.7 update Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 22:57:44 -0500 Message-ID: <20161124035744.GA507@jasmine> References: <20161121164827.GA29287@jasmine> <87mvgs92ac.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20161121183230.GA31354@jasmine> <87oa156gfi.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33634) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9lAV-0000dH-Nt for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 22:57:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9lAS-0007WD-Lc for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 22:57:51 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87oa156gfi.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:21:21PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi! > > Leo Famulari skribis: > > > It would be nice to remove the grafts soon, but it's over the 1200 > > rebuild limit for staging: > > > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html > > > > But, I'll put it on staging if there is a consensus. I guess that > > staging will end up requiring more than 1200 rebuilds anyways, since > > there could be multiple changes with that much impact, but affecting > > different parts of the package graph. > > Yes, that should be OK, especially since it’s a safe change. I made the change, updating libtiff to 4.0.7 and building it with GCC 5, in 0bd1097c50950d47954b4dc136654dfbde45d5b1. I had already updated it on core-updates; should I revert that change?