From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: gnupg: Update to 2.1.16.
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 00:56:06 -0500
Message-ID: <20161120055605.GA9095@jasmine>
References: <bb22c993e12071beaafbceeb08415a20452b664c.1479580353.git.leo@famulari.name>
	<20161119224131.GA16874@macbook42.flashner.co.il>
	<20161119230930.GA7836@jasmine> <87k2bz9hd9.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34405)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1c8r74-0003pl-8X
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 11:06:35 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1c8r6z-0005La-HH
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 11:06:34 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87k2bz9hd9.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 12:31:30AM +0100, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
> 
> > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 12:41:31AM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> >> Looks like they forgot to bootstrap it then.
> >
> > Because I altered two Makefile.am files in the 'patch-paths' phase, I
> > had to re-do the bootstrap in order for the Makefiles to be regenerated.
> >
> > I'm not an expert on Autotools. Does anyone know if there is a better
> > way?
> 
> I have not tried but unless some weird issue, I think you can safely
> replace "/bin/pwd" directly in the generated Makefile(s) instead of the
> Makefile.am sources.
> 
> This should fix the Autotools dependency and the warning.

I read a bit more and learned about $GNUPGHOME. `/bin/pwd/` is only
invoked if that variable is unset, so I set it in the test suite, and
it works for me.

And the problem with $HOME not existing, worked around by the set-home
phase, was apparently fixed in:

https://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=gnupg.git;a=commitdiff;h=38d369de13acb95208a0ed8d1cf82ac19173688f;hp=fde9fa81d3d3b25a929b532cc1960d9d9f454a0c

Which I learned about here:

https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-gnupg/gnupg2.git/commit/?id=bbcd4f60e834c79454d1eaf4adf052f8ff545f99

Pushed as 764c5662211793d381b6c4a85f6a1ef4ad353c3f