From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add a generalized `wrap-language-programs`
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 03:34:37 -0500
Message-ID: <20161118083437.GB10225@jasmine>
References: <20161116132734.5943-1-alex@pompo.co>
	<582C6035.1070202@crazy-compilers.com> <87d1hunlmy.fsf@gmail.com>
	<20161117211532.GC5556@jasmine> <87a8cxnrlp.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46363)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1c7ed9-0000HH-7Y
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 03:34:43 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1c7ed5-0004uu-A8
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 03:34:43 -0500
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:45347)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1c7ed5-0004uf-2f
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 03:34:39 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87a8cxnrlp.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Alex Sassmannshausen <alex.sassmannshausen@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 09:02:10AM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
> > Changes like this will need to go on the core-updates branch, where we
> > make changes to the core of the system.
> 
> Makes sense, I will push it to core-updates tonight.

To clarify, I didn't read all the patches yet, and I'm not the best
person to review them. I was just trying to explain why it might take a
long time to test this kind of change.