From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix ardour and mod-host builds. Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 10:03:47 +0200 Message-ID: <20161115080347.GA24482@macbook42.flashner.co.il> References: <20161114224342.11644-1-rekado@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57942) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6Yii-0001Qr-7V for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 03:03:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6Yif-0000iA-1Q for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 03:03:56 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:52163) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6Yie-0000hn-Pt for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 03:03:52 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161114224342.11644-1-rekado@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:43:41PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > This patch requires quite a few rebuilds. It is needed to fix the build = of > at least Ardour and mod-host. >=20 > Should this go to core-updates? >=20 > Ricardo Wurmus (1): > gnu: fftw: Build threads library. >=20 > gnu/packages/algebra.scm | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >=20 > --=20 > 2.10.1 >=20 Building the following 241 packages would ensure 444 dependent packages are rebuilt: I think we're going to have an intermediate branch for the 300-1200 rebuilds that shouldn't cause any breakages, and IMO this looks like it's a perfect candidate for such a branch. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJYKsFYAAoJEPTB05F+rO6T2wYP/jxGHO8vF28SPDNla74gd+43 gGZU5mevGdSSid+8zAQ31k83XMZCaxRCokUdVU6fMX9dyQW/tfrKE8KRh93hPP1A 9RE0Trf2CBvsLFuOwLFFnWjFKfy4NUj7nghmpEVjmt4FmprSwCrcXCPEw+wFY+xN xqw3T4MZt0lj9FvNe1M2bZR6xVQ03SnbYo5dlXkoOX62UqD+n3MFCjHhoL+w6UNd 3y6kGKeOfSIiDW4mYRslY7W2cb9QsUFhsIWI8yT2EG/Ih/Dx0sIfUonHG0qJDVo9 9iJngiEftkukusjeDR1uwCEhl7VyvTqORp2pKyc1mEM4WbVZoPrWX2PfRoX96Faj oI63YeW1ZuWibFn1qwPa6gBBomlVythZk3PNHmhMs1i9hmvIKIAEg/GmUMmXSKsm kWzBjAWsXnn3NomI9/zTzbGwyvAc98GCo9j9U2Er9Mp6Xq9qPwedS3wOfM0Uvi8M MnX2YTBnzFLmr1R6M2oGLsXLAuRgRjnRzgHA7UGCo/rdnTCoiddAy8dJToQoONM/ FuP4KvwibAGDfGEiUpuIxvKedGrkZY0n713oGLn2iVkJ7Yc9wSELLIoyp8FAu86A XPCbkpa6wygCWl6TMAuwqElP0SF9pMxfgdIwvvjY0VdWYMvtptjpIawfmX6z56vR z+eRU6z3zGiS7qgbP1FS =3S4J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+--