From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Darrington <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] gnu: Separate util-linux into three packages.
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 16:28:08 +0100
Message-ID: <20161112152808.GA21994@jocasta.intra>
References: <1478812461-18483-1-git-send-email-jmd@gnu.org>
	<87wpg8lpfc.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46021)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>) id 1c5aED-0003Hy-9w
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 10:28:26 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>) id 1c5aEC-0001gx-C1
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 10:28:25 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87wpg8lpfc.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic Court??s <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, John Darrington <jmd@gnu.org>


--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 03:53:59PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
     Hi!
    =20
     John Darrington <jmd@gnu.org> skribis:
    =20
     > * gnu/packages/linux.scm (util-linux/base): New variable,
     > (util-linux/mount): New variable,  (util-linux) Refine
     > inheriting from util-linux/base.
    =20
     Do I get it right that these changes aim to make ???mount -t nfs??? wo=
rk?
     That is, to allow ???mount??? to find the ???mount.nfs???(?) program.

That is correct.
    =20
     If so, would it work to just do:
    =20
       "--enable-fs-paths-default=3D/run/current-system/profile/sbin"
    =20
     ?
    =20
     That would only work on GuixSD, but Guix???s ???mount??? is certainly =
not very
     useful on foreign distros.
    =20

That would certainly be a solution easier to do.  =20
But doesn't it mean that we have a "functionally impure" system?

J'

--=20
Avoid eavesdropping.  Send strong encrypted email.
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3=20
fingerprint =3D 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.


--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlgnNQcACgkQimdxnC3oJ7M7iwCfftQ8Z7Uk692dMxdtFAmEhNCf
OTwAn2ryO0MQhy63CV/GAERIr7AedqJj
=ByNB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh--