Re: [PATCH 1/3] gnu: lua: Update to 5.3.3.

[Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1517 bytes --]

On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 06:43:39PM +0000, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> writes:
> > Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
> >> Does this lua52-liblua-so.patch still apply / is it still needed for Lua
> >> 5.3? I remember that there were significant differences between how Lua
> >> 5.1 and 5.2 in terms of building a dynamic Lua library.
> >>
> >> If so, I guess we should rename it.
> >
> > I tried building 5.3 initially without patches and noticed the shared
> > library was not created. It applies cleanly and works as advertised.
> >
> > Should I rename it to just lua-liblua-so.patch? IMO the version number
> > is useful information, even if it applies for a later minor release. I'm
> > in favor of keeping it, and create the lua54 equivalent if/when needed.
> 
> How should we proceed with this? I think renaming it to
> "lua-liblua-so.patch" is fine, since it applies to the current release.
> 
> Another option is "lua52-lua53-liblua-so.patch", although we will have
> to keep renaming it for all future versions it applies to in that case,
> which seems like unnecessary noise.
> 
> The third option is of course keeping the lua52 name, but I see how that
> can be confusing for the next code spelunker.
> 
> I don't have a strong opinion either way, but will go ahead with the
> first option unless there are any objections.

The first option sounds good. Please add a comment to the patch
mentioning which Lua versions it should be used for.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]