From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add nethogs. Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 13:09:39 -0400 Message-ID: <20161030170939.GA31404@jasmine> References: <20161030164427.1817-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wac7ysb48OaltWcw" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44227) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0tcB-0004tM-Ry for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 13:09:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0tc6-0004w0-Oe for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 13:09:47 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:59002) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0tc6-0004vu-KD for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 13:09:42 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Arun Isaac Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --wac7ysb48OaltWcw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:34:54PM +0530, Arun Isaac wrote: >=20 > > + (arguments > > + `(#:make-flags `("CC=3Dgcc" > > + ,(string-append "PREFIX=3D" %output)) > > + #:phases > > + (modify-phases %standard-phases > > + (delete 'configure)))) >=20 > I haven't moved the binary to /bin yet. If we can come to some consensus > on that, I'll make that change as well. We typically package what the upstream maintainers offer, and only make changes in order to fix bugs or to adapt the software to the functional packaging paradigm. In this case, I don't see a reason to change the directory the software is installed to. Is there a reason to change it? --wac7ysb48OaltWcw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYFilPAAoJECZG+jC6yn8IBy8QAN3fzUGqiGPBUy+5bb7syoPR Artb5N9Bmv8GZz0JIFzYUAmpJzFNGx+Gp+I9RNsAhVfDO9c4EMa22jNSSVBFHA5A KF4kbIiq+eXvpSJljvI7M9Lc7a6FVN2VrO4veBwfKZSaD9Hl2Ch1ZODJ30diu8/O 2w82Rd6UKSm44iMRrju5yO90ejLR54IkwUPWjxUY4uX1qwN+8zH5HJcwoDXUx6Nc 36ENHa2sfCt2TI6O0fDM6OFiL7LlLwms2Qda659M8OC/aOX99uDjCtfeWxJVtSUf P8cTvTu/95IoLe3ZEXYuFvFkOJcJQt6edTM60C3pX9GNMUeq9r6QYFIgz7rJShFN WN9hXcTJinFGP9QyOkD5w04QT0lCVPYVrFvHuyg+Ld+E5z1OuU38Fk1iII7noVQ0 Vi2JnzjrEiH/qmmjt/DeJT64ZP+RQXL8uNPzgZRTqJCpbnaNQyaStNAzPtJcwTZW +K7JMrmkOCAnasvZCBQKSCG2ebQkOZ03U6B9C8aore0CcZghpbVWbMMGIwLmu0mU RZs8PqCX+oGVItS9biGN1EFQEEvEAHxw2oXaQodX+06a3uknNvRhB4nkds+2WdZl KqUmPEviLttCe2dtopuvIvM+6Gt7w0YNpdOekx6NFSQF7NvrvwbM462rNwbz4M1p 0e1WFAdcwcESwbcT/XlN =fUrI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wac7ysb48OaltWcw--