From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add qtwebkit. Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 20:22:14 -0400 Message-ID: <20161030002214.GA18050@jasmine> References: <20161028.112601.737405433041352600.post@thomasdanckaert.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59213) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0dtD-0004lL-8H for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 20:22:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0dtA-00011d-1W for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 20:22:19 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:40867) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0dt9-00011Z-U7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 20:22:15 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161028.112601.737405433041352600.post@thomasdanckaert.be> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Thomas Danckaert Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:26:01AM +0200, Thomas Danckaert wrote: > Hi, > > this patch adds QtWebKit 5.7 as a separate package (hopefully this > will reduce security concerns: only packages which really need > QtWebKit will include it). > > QtWebKit is not officially supported anymore as of Qt 5.6, so this is > a “community release” (not exactly sure what that entails, or if this > includes any updates at all since the Qt 5.5 version). I suppose many > projects are switching to Qt WebEngine, and there are some efforts to > create an updated version of QtWebKit > (https://github.com/annulen/webkit), but in the mean time, this > package might help build packages which still rely on the old > QtWebKit. Interesting! Is there any official statement from Qt about these "community releases"? I see that it is hosted on qt.io, so presumably they are somehow blessed by Qt, but I'd like more information.