From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] gnu: chez-scheme: Add search-path and fix i686 build. Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:32:44 -0400 Message-ID: <20161019173244.GF8998@jasmine> References: <878ttognhp.fsf@elephly.net> <8737jvaylr.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50477) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwujR-0008OB-Pd for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:32:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwujN-0002MB-I6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:32:49 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Federico Beffa Cc: Guix-devel On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 06:28:45PM +0200, Federico Beffa wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Hello Federico, > > > > Federico Beffa skribis: > > > >> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > >> From 7875840eb0f0d0d844da40735faabd10b791f0dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >> From: Federico Beffa > >> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:01:11 +0200 > >> Subject: [PATCH 02/17] gnu: chez-scheme: Fix i686 build. > >> > >> * gnu/packages/scheme.scm (chez-scheme): Add 'configure-flags', generalize > >> 'configure' phase and simplify 'install-doc' phase. > > This patch was meant to fix the i686 build, but it looks like it doesn't :-( > > The patch adds a 'configure-flags' argument specifying the machine > type as instructed by Chez '-/configure --help' message. In addition, > patching of the make files was generalized to recognize compiler flags > for all architectures (previously it only recognized x86_64 ones). > However, because I'm short on space I only checked that I didn't break > the 64bit version and didn't build the 32bit one. Heh :) I recently dug out my LVM cheat sheet and increased my /gnu/store capacity by 20 GB. It was worth the 20 minutes of downtime!