From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Guile 2.0.13 Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:35:42 -0400 Message-ID: <20161012163542.GA32216@jasmine> References: <8760oxpwsd.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44102) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buMVc-0006VW-G1 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:36:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buMVZ-0003cB-BZ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:36:00 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8760oxpwsd.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 02:38:26PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Given that core-updates with Guile 2.0.12 is on its way and that master > is still at 2.0.11, I’d suggest to leave master as-is and focus on > core-updates. > > There we have 2 options: > > 1. Changing ‘guile-2.0/fixed’ to 2.0.13, but 1,310 packages depend on it. > > 2. Grafting 2.0.13, which is doable since 2.0.12 and .13 have the same ABI. Considering that 2.0.13 fixes a bug that is exposed by grafting, it's a bit of shame to provide it with a graft. But if we are too far along, it's understandable. We could always un-graft it between releases if Hydra isn't busy.