From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: master fails to system build (at-spi2-core? guix?) Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 12:24:31 -0400 Message-ID: <20161005162431.GB10968@jasmine> References: <87r37w2jne.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87oa302jfb.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <874m4skr8a.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <871szwkqyd.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87wphng4dm.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60916) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1brozt-00026g-GC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 12:24:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1brozp-000403-9W for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 12:24:44 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:34392) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1brozn-0003yP-Vs for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 12:24:41 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wphng4dm.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 12:01:57AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > ng0 writes: > > > ng0 writes: > > > >> So the build machine was still on guix-0.10something. I had to use > >> --fallback and while at-spi2-core is gone too, this machine fails > >> differently: > > > > and --without-grafs it succeeds at least on that machine... this bug is > > weird. > > […] > > >> suspicious ownership or permission on `/gnu/store/lqjbg0h8055v5yxpv8xzxn86jhk76k05-guix-0.11.0-1.4420'; rejecting this build output > > I also sometimes get these “suspicious ownership” errors. ISTR that > this an unresolved bug. Just rerunning the command usually does it for > me. This is the bug report: http://bugs.gnu.org/22954