From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add Vc Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 18:30:40 -0400 Message-ID: <20161001223040.GA7541@jasmine> References: <20161001222412.GA6848@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49166) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqSo2-0000em-VC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2016 18:30:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqSny-0006aF-QF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2016 18:30:53 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:52908) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqSnx-0006XL-Jv for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2016 18:30:50 -0400 Received: from localhost (96-90-63-214-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [96.90.63.214]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A421BCC089 for ; Sat, 1 Oct 2016 18:30:41 -0400 (EDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161001222412.GA6848@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 06:24:12PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > This is a depend of Krita. =2E.. dependency > From 808b47b3b7a9d769f3a6a873d19a0051f64720f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Leo Famulari > Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:38:20 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add Vc. >=20 > * gnu/packages/maths.scm (vc): New variable. > + (arguments > + '(#:configure-flags > + '("-DBUILD_TESTING=3DON"))) ; Is this the test suite we want? I didn't mean to leave this comment in the patch. I do think this is the right way to run the tests. --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJX8DkQAAoJECZG+jC6yn8I2h8QAKu92on2UeCY6HhHyBbywSUN QwjqDrbL6Iea0g31RN5+o3QyTXp2np3kMejuKKnkROpUSh53Km42kUXy3WvTxbVS XQTLcYeHFK6mes1Ml2ozUEevAmPO7V64NXgdeD5ShColIHZZ52OQUqJAyPAEhYAY UdMKoZm2rJtHVX/5ygtpp6bQHLKVlnQVkXeJpsiHFHckRmmgrUuQuBRLqYLLcpNw UZEON125NlpmPDtBmM2gQJB09B7rHfL58dv7obyPmCZkxR+hIA4KgjOi5AHuaVGY ecC1hlz2zipPHiMf8zpBtq5L2r3qM3yGjyo0zkobYo5nHYK4KZZdYG527FFTCdQ/ wypAwYjdBgx1IRHuCPwYEvHkMieGYKHK/PsKj5TT1bB4oCpqGJhwH4JFEw56l5XX WoS9ubwPJ5TIVxtgqkjBAU1A+WFauxtQKLAm0uOuJFVSEwi0NfobllSynD1fhOUR xMPE6r6A9GD9Ke4XYw9PD6nNmU3VL2AaFVoMzJ5rU9KYPeq04lJZwfLRtvYplmPd cgKK87lgm03TGlhA24S3L7fJaRhQcN1JVBOeoJanwfDqOgWw+zgvurAI/aj5f2h3 03+dfootckpoPaRfNOUQgQsGYqpZN/HOg4Fd2rU2kLaS289LbUGb/FVwb9wZWu9m dvTo2KdcUaUhDqeciS8J =sUob -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm--