From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: propagating inputs in ghc-* packages Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 12:31:08 -0400 Message-ID: <20161001163108.GB1499@jasmine> References: <871t00v7fy.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40659) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqNC6-0006qx-Rc for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2016 12:31:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqNC1-0008Rf-K8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2016 12:31:21 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:54476) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqNC0-0008RD-Do for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2016 12:31:17 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871t00v7fy.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: Guix-devel , Federico Beffa On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 09:45:21AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > I’m preparing a patch to remove propagation from all Haskell packages. > Now the question is only whether to do this all in one patch or in one > patch per package… :) I'd say whichever method is easiest :) And then we can test it with Hydra on a ghc-updates branch.