From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Error in gexp.scm. Unrecognized keyword. Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 12:56:41 -0400 Message-ID: <20160925165641.GA9055@jasmine> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52230) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boCjX-00030y-79 for help-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 12:56:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boCjT-0007XD-31 for help-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 12:56:54 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:49480) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boCjR-0007Ss-T4 for help-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 12:56:51 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: Dmitry Nikolaev Cc: help-guix On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:35:36PM +0300, Dmitry Nikolaev wrote: > Hi. > > I wanted to update my GuixSD installation, but everytime I run "guix system > reconfigure ..." I'm getting > > guix/gexp.scm:314:0: In procedure computed-file: > guix/gexp.scm:314:0: In procedure # #:key options)>: Unrecognized keyword > > I've tried guix pull and guix refresh, nothing helped. Slightly off-topic, but you probably don't need to use `guix refresh` here. `guix refresh` is used to automatically update some package definitions in a Git checkout of Guix, while testing new upstream releases before sending the updates to guix-devel. It's not part of a typical GuixSD system update process. > > What is wrong with my guix installation and gexp.scm? I haven't seen > anybody complaining about it in this mailing list. What do I have to do to > update my GuixSD installation? Most likely there is some problem with your OS configuration (typically '/etc/config.scm'). Can you share it if there is nothing sensitive or private in it?