Re: [PATCH] Add gctp

[Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>]

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 07:08:08PM +0200, Thomas Danckaert wrote:
> Hi Guix,
> 
> I've cleaned up my gctp patch, following your advice:
> 
> From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add gctp
> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:47:23 -0400
> 
> > If it's not possible to use the bundled GCTPs then we have to use an
> > external library, but I think it should be maintained outside of Guix.
> > As you say, it should not be much work to put it on a public Git repo or
> > to host a tarball, since the development is basically complete.
> 
> I took the contents of the gctpc20.tar.Z archive distributed with wgrib2,
> added an autoconf-based build script, and published the repository on
> Github.  Changes are minor: I had to make some changes to the test programs,
> and fix one input routine (int size mismatch when reading an auxiliary
> binary file).
> 
> This version of the patch uses a release tarball published on github. Is
> there a better place I can host a tarball (if not the repository itself?).

Wow, thank you! A GitHub tarball is fine if it works (and this one
does).

> +    (version "2.0")
> +    (source
> +     (origin
> +       (method url-fetch)
> +       (uri "https://github.com/OkoSanto/GCTP/archive/v2.0.0.tar.gz")

The only thing I would like to change is this mismatch between the
version and the tarball name. Can we call it version 2.0.0?

Also, we should add a (file-name) field so that the downloaded tarball
has "gctp" in the name.

I can make these changes locally if you think they are okay.