From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Mail to this list is slow? Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 01:11:12 -0400 Message-ID: <20160923051112.GB17132@jasmine> References: <20160922132746.GA8000@jocasta.intra> <87shss6nlz.fsf@thor.jamestechnotes.com> <87eg4bdge1.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87zimz7niw.fsf@elephly.net> <20160922234835.GA11190@jasmine> <20160923045123.GA23992@jocasta.intra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37838) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnIli-0001yk-JO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 01:11:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnIle-0007RU-Ct for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 01:11:25 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:43238) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnIld-0007Pn-6V for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 01:11:22 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160923045123.GA23992@jocasta.intra> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: John Darrington Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 06:51:23AM +0200, John Darrington wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 07:48:35PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 09:16:55PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > Theodoros Foradis writes: > > > James Richardson writes: > > >> John Darrington writes: > > >>> A number of people have said that mail to this list takes a lo= ng time to=20 > > >>> show up. Today I too have noticed that some of my patches hav= e not (yet) > > >>> appeared in the archives. > > >> > > >> I've posted a patch several hours ago, haven't seen it in the a= rchives. > > > > > > A couple of days ago, I sent a patch series, which I resent afte= r about > > > 16 hours , and only then it appeared duplicate in the mailing > > > list. There seems to be some issue. > >=20 > > Usually, the first emails to the lists take a little while longer = to > > appear. After that things should be faster. > =20 > I had this experience, too. I assume it's some sort of spam mitigati= on. > Generally these mailing lists deliver mail more or less instantaneou= sly, > but the first time is slow. >=20 > I don't understand what is meant by "the first time". Are you saying the= first > ever email the list receives is slow, but all subsequent ones are faster = - or > are you saying something else? The first time that a person sends an email to a given list.