From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: OpenSSL updates Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:47:26 -0400 Message-ID: <20160922174726.GA14616@jasmine> References: <20160922135527.GA13557@jasmine> <87twd7dhdg.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53079) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bn86A-0001mm-DZ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:47:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bn862-0005PG-AZ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:47:47 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:55369) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bn860-0005NQ-Vg for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:47:42 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87twd7dhdg.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:33:15PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > +(define-public openssl-1.0.2i >=20 > Should this be kept private? Otherwise, both patches look good to me, > please push. Good catch. I also realized that these patches change what variable is used when using 'openssl' with the Guix command-line tools. Without these patches, `guix build openssl` uses (@@ (gnu packages tls) openssl-next) [0] With these patches, `guix build openssl` uses (@@ (gnu packages tls) openssl-1.0.2i) So, I put (replacement #f) in openssl-next, which restores the old behavior. We don't want to replace openssl-next with openssl-1.0.2i. Pushed HEAD to 163d93a6bd231596959e2e157b60eb964db85d04 [0] Is that the right way to describe a package variable? That's how I use `guix build -e`. --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJX5BkqAAoJECZG+jC6yn8ImpEQAMlLhLaj32w+D7XTlCJzeaQs H+k9IGIf1nzTbhm8LMhcfcPLG3YjQH4E6j/GFSvMrpYgOtsY3p7bNheSFzRqFJnr 1SvwMdLjoc0cCq2SKiy7Lgc3s506UTBDICzF8ezSeVFj70ZVf5BieGeuvVUUn7LO V1LmguIJ/svMGFHHBWUvgkSmE8hpgluj3RUjiUIwb5iYomqDm8JZCvMrM00yIG/s bQLvF/eVkMh02HjXE4d2SQt/JxhJ1ko0/6zvHRr71uA26QuR/j8MVGAXzvTfHjSH no3ozy5GI7BGt6rWKsuJl2s85j/I9evo8OCbjQVRButNotvIPTIjkf/6sjdqaB1f mzd1kr1jOjAICzAd58XHvpbnmTIT8TXJO3ChiEySqzkzekQDOWqUQ8Mz+JGoHutf XmDFNojluLz+/XJeEha4F4j0FtCARrrWqdufy5h2F+ZNcZVaaamNZ6r5yHYHajcP gqaQW6zFzBHAI/Qip4WlJqOihEN0FIvVipxL4qxWqxBC3wOHedacG1u8D9ouQT4w BSKJ9zcWvbYn81JfYu0ubZm67ruRzzn369T6Qdf9zGiT05zLS4ZaaPpTll43EpRw NPEpGnhpcRybSqxrVZ+O5hX2PFjrWZB1FH3UAcGBJwXRxhPVXRrer5MhxPERLTCb TSPg7yAwe3yP2oPA+XVn =dneQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK--