From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Updated patches for gunicorn Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 11:07:03 +0200 Message-ID: <20160918090703.GA4251@solar> References: <1473936893-20306-1-git-send-email-h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39155) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blY47-0000Mm-Lh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 05:07:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blY44-0002UU-F6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 05:07:11 -0400 Received: from mailrelay1.public.one.com ([91.198.169.124]:33861) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blY44-0002Tk-1P for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 05:07:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1473936893-20306-1-git-send-email-h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Hartmut Goebel Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hello, On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:54:51PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote: > As discussed, I updated some comments. Additionally I added building teh > documentation (2nd patch). > Hartmut Goebel (2): > gnu: Add gunicorn and gunicorn-python2. sorry for being late to the discussion. We build python2 versions of "libraries" so that people can use them in their own scripts. In the case of something that is supposed to be used essentially as a binary, I do not think it is useful to add a second binary built with the old python, and that one package would be enough. What do you think? Andreas