From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add qscintilla.
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 10:36:56 +0200
Message-ID: <20160918083656.GA4235@solar>
References: <87a8fddnyi.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87r38ndfwb.fsf@openmailbox.org>
	<20160913170529.GD20731@jasmine> <87k2efd6gy.fsf@openmailbox.org>
	<20160913193906.GC31892@macbook42.flashner.co.il>
	<874m5jcz8w.fsf@openmailbox.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34322)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1blXb0-000640-FP
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 04:37:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1blXaw-0003it-Ao
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 04:37:05 -0400
Received: from mailrelay6.public.one.com ([91.198.169.200]:22817)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1blXav-0003iF-Tp
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 04:37:02 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <874m5jcz8w.fsf@openmailbox.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Kei Kebreau <kei@openmailbox.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hello,

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 04:37:35PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote:
> In this case, should I leave qtscintilla-qt4 as a public package in qt.scm
> instead of maths.scm as Leo suggested?

since it is used for only one package and relies on the deprecated qt@4,
I would leave it private, regardless its name.

Andreas