From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add qscintilla. Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:56:07 -0400 Message-ID: <20160914185607.GB22240@jasmine> References: <87a8fddnyi.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87r38ndfwb.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20160913170529.GD20731@jasmine> <87k2efd6gy.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20160913193906.GC31892@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <874m5jcz8w.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20160914170819.GA4003@jasmine> <87vaxyic67.fsf@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46007) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bkFM5-0001H1-2r for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:56:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bkFM0-00020m-SZ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:56:20 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:33689) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bkFLy-0001w4-Iy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:56:16 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87vaxyic67.fsf@openmailbox.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Kei Kebreau Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:11:44PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: >=20 > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 08:48:43PM +0000, Efraim Flashner wrote: > >> On September 13, 2016 11:37:35 PM GMT+03:00, Kei Kebreau > >> wrote: > >> >In this case, should I leave qtscintilla-qt4 as a public package in > >> >qt.scm > >> >instead of maths.scm as Leo suggested? > >>=20 > >> That's where I would leave it. You could also leave a note, saying > >> that it was for octave, and if they switch to qt5 then we can get rid > >> of it. We still have an old vte package I added for a terminal since > >> all the bug reports around it haven't been cleared yet, and that's > >> with the other versions of vte. --=20 > > > > Sounds like a plan! >=20 > Alright then! I have all three patches here. Tell me if I did anything > funny. The order of application is "Add qscintilla, Add qscintilla-qt4, > Enable Octave's Qt 4 GUI." :) The patches "Add qscintilla" and "Add qscintilla-qt4" both add both packages. --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJX2Z1DAAoJECZG+jC6yn8I90wP/3H69hfnK2tOITq1PRNNIWar qBBjlaN+rp4snwexCdZWjBbqhaaDTjI1IxbZMED67ivZ9STGfoDVXFmJJwhR8M7f 3pGgYt7QFqCbPssWIhVKq7pmT/AfGQL3PsXMjI5c97W1Tbx1NuRXGUYHvVN4CpN7 4ZKnJfmqF5MIiG5t6VorKYSg+05HzO3gCRzxe4j5YXO/K5q3aqIOzndHRYYBzNdZ vyjWAgEs/dgIgS6iaQoD3YzmSp2EL0INukVveZ5yGEVPxX+S3sUCn0XqhS2M1kZ+ GKQTQxV/IkqNc9jo8j+2cVdxa9wfiw6xlXZawG+SnAGHTVh63TjA+JobDHqCN0l+ JHScP77vYhZZAT+mYqh2Kc9IOQpClX77QjHQuchpolWGw5biRAYYIsssBLzeQ7GI mphzk11BmCgXEHpZr3UXS+4HeUTRu3Tqko0zLEvZQv8JsuDQKhUAT6iHIqczvNF8 bfk9omSsq/hBNZNxb/FhTN6+NdWHCzknkUHdOogHukHI98xBylBldwfDsA5GscK5 ly/ZX8XaTItPK0/MHPQhY6ktR9Lfh9ryhUjGviXfqF+ml/VYLg5RW0sj5DzKlP0K 8Te2f+fdX4mRTkEyY3WHYQ1z7RRJ29fNDq2YJT46/p8XslNdxblNL0MMhOnysIyX CVzmMGoBBBkt4bFRsE7f =bLF1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C--