From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Expat regression fix for master branch Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:14:48 -0400 Message-ID: <20160914181448.GB12678@jasmine> References: <20160912213515.GA15911@jasmine> <87eg4nqxdq.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37367) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bkEiB-0003hj-Ju for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:15:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bkEi6-00061o-H7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:15:06 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87eg4nqxdq.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:54:09PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > It’s enough to have the patch in ‘core-updates’ only, but I could go > either way. WDYT? I could go either way, too. It depends on how much we want to support use of Guix outside of our package tree. At least we have made the issue public here on the mailing list, and provided a patch for whoever needs it. Does anyone else have an opinion about this?