From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add qscintilla. Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:08:19 -0400 Message-ID: <20160914170819.GA4003@jasmine> References: <87a8fddnyi.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87r38ndfwb.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20160913170529.GD20731@jasmine> <87k2efd6gy.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20160913193906.GC31892@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <874m5jcz8w.fsf@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45460) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bkDfq-0002wm-3B for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:08:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bkDfm-000897-Qg for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:08:37 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:40696) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bkDfk-00087Y-AM for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:08:34 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Efraim Flashner Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 08:48:43PM +0000, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On September 13, 2016 11:37:35 PM GMT+03:00, Kei Kebreau wrote: > >In this case, should I leave qtscintilla-qt4 as a public package in > >qt.scm > >instead of maths.scm as Leo suggested? > > That's where I would leave it. You could also leave a note, saying > that it was for octave, and if they switch to qt5 then we can get rid > of it. We still have an old vte package I added for a terminal since > all the bug reports around it haven't been cleared yet, and that's > with the other versions of vte. -- Sounds like a plan!