From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Darrington <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add microcom
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 19:37:49 +0200
Message-ID: <20160913173749.GA25835@jocasta.intra>
References: <1473613018-22728-1-git-send-email-jmd@gnu.org>
	<20160913153617.GA13516@jasmine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39357)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>) id 1bjrer-0000GN-UE
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:38:11 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>) id 1bjreq-0005lu-Ir
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:38:09 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160913153617.GA13516@jasmine>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, John Darrington <jmd@gnu.org>


--CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:36:17AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
     On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 06:56:58PM +0200, John Darrington wrote:
     > * gnu/packages/microcom.scm: New file.
     > * gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it.
    =20
     > +    (version "2016.01.09")
    =20
     I think we should use the upstream tag, "v2016.01.0".
    =20
     > +    (source (origin
     > +              (method git-fetch)
     > +              (uri (git-reference
     > +                    (url "git://git.pengutronix.de/git/tools/microc=
om.git")
     > +                    (commit "caf3687611ca855b4fa80c2a9a2fbb020834fc=
4e")))
    =20
     Then, you can use the tag name as the commit. The tag I mentioned is
     equivalent to this commit.

I will do that.  Thanks.
    =20
     > +    (license gpl2+)))
    =20
     My interpretation of the first paragraph of COPYING [0] is that the
     package is licensed under the GPL version 2 only. What do you think?

All the .c files in the package explicitly say "either version 2 of the Lic=
ense,
 or (at your option) any later version".
    =20

J'

--=20
Avoid eavesdropping.  Send strong encrypted email.
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3=20
fingerprint =3D 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.


--CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlfYOW0ACgkQimdxnC3oJ7ON/wCdG2L8zKykMb9ethzyQI48QDGW
VBsAn2PKBcKdLFF6+ZY6ezYfQGyMLz7c
=P8sU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK--