From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add dlib. Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 01:14:05 -0400 Message-ID: <20160913051405.GA10070@jasmine> References: <87k2f957wt.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <8760qr5o8n.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87eg5e4g4r.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20160824172608.GA24668@jasmine> <878tvm2ddh.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87mvjuz5ae.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20160831190908.GD12396@jasmine> <874m5ps1zk.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87k2ekq6jt.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20160910181609.GA30696@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50707) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjg33-0001qJ-9v for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 01:14:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjg2y-0000Pb-8V for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 01:14:20 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:42863) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjg2w-0000MJ-Vd for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 01:14:16 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160910181609.GA30696@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel , Alex Kost On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 02:16:09PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 01:32:22PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > > Marius Bakke writes: > > > > > Leo Famulari writes: > > > > > >> Changing the subject, you could disable the tests per-architecture. Look > > >> for uses of current-target-system and current-system for usage examples. > > >> But this is not absolutely required, IMO. > > > > > > This latest patch series now disables tests on a per-arch basis. > > > > > > There may be others on MIPS failing after the timeout, but extending the > > > list should be obvious. > > > > Here are the patches again, with the "failing-tests" variable renamed to > > "disabled-tests". Let me know if I can provide anything else. Thanks! > > Looks reasonable to me. Does anyone else have any comments? Okay, pushed! Thanks Marius!