From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add mash.
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 17:20:59 -0400
Message-ID: <20160910212059.GA7137@jasmine>
References: <87h9a2yweu.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<20160831194426.GC22495@jasmine> <87zinsae3u.fsf@elephly.net>
	<87shtkq6rc.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<20160906210127.GB1089@jasmine>
	<87eg4urqq3.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60902)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bipi6-0005I5-8P
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 17:21:15 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bipi3-0002yj-0G
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 17:21:14 -0400
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:35824)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bipi1-0002uU-0m
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 17:21:10 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87eg4urqq3.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:06:44PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:00:39AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> >> I had these in inputs initially and was surprised to see no references.
> >> Both seems to be compiled into the final program[0]: when running "mash
> >> info" on an invalid file (the provided data/refseq.msh), a generic
> >> capnproto exception is thrown (src/capnp/serialize.c++:159).
> >
> > I wonder, does using native-inputs work when building mash for another
> > architecture?
> 
> That's interesting, the package indeed fails to build on i686.

Do you mean that it fails when you try to build from x86_64 using `guix
build --system=i686-linux`? I wondered if that particular case would
work since the packages that are native-inputs would only be built for
the architecture of the builder, if I understand correctly.