From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add mash. Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 17:01:27 -0400 Message-ID: <20160906210127.GB1089@jasmine> References: <87h9a2yweu.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20160831194426.GC22495@jasmine> <87zinsae3u.fsf@elephly.net> <87shtkq6rc.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57792) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhNkw-0002nL-FM for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 17:18:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhNks-0000gZ-UA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 17:18:10 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:54243) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhNkr-0000er-OF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 17:18:06 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87shtkq6rc.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:00:39AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > I had these in inputs initially and was surprised to see no references. > Both seems to be compiled into the final program[0]: when running "mash > info" on an invalid file (the provided data/refseq.msh), a generic > capnproto exception is thrown (src/capnp/serialize.c++:159). I wonder, does using native-inputs work when building mash for another architecture? > That raises another question: should the htslib and capnproto licenses > be listed too, since they are part of the binary output? Good question, I'm not sure. I'd guess "yes", along with a code comment explaining what's going on. > > I'm not a bioinformatician (just a mere sysadmin for such), but have > been going through the tutorial and things appear to work fine. Ah, bioinformatics software... all bets are off ;)