Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0

[Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>]

On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 02:29:16PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
> 
> > On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 10:35:09PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >> Seems like most of the arguments and phases are shared with ‘openssl’,
> >> right?  What about using ‘substitute-keyword-arguments’ to reduce
> >> duplication?  Or are you concerned about potential breakage when one
> >> series or the other changes?
> >
> > I've attached an updated patch using 'substitute-keyword-arguments'.
> >
> > BTW, my previous patch made a one-line change to 'move-man3-pages',
> > deleting the leftover empty man3 directory in the main output after
> > copying the manpages to the 'doc' output. Is this change desired?
> 
> Sure.  Perhaps you can commit this part to core-updates?

Done!

> > From 83405a4ea3628cababd2ee5904c8d0628a002d05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
> > Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 16:07:29 -0400
> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add openssl-next.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/tls.scm (openssl-next): New variable.
> > * gnu/packages/patches/openssl-1.1.0-c-rehash-in.patch: New file.
> > * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
> 
> LGTM, thank you!

Pushed! Thanks for the review :)