From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs. Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 23:42:56 +0300 Message-ID: <20160903204255.GD4019@macbook42.flashner.co.il> References: <87wpiwruyd.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87inuf27h7.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20160902002755.GA30382@jocasta.intra> <87vayfm821.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <8737liam03.fsf@gmail.com> <87shtiogoq.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <878tvafu6g.fsf@gmail.com> <20160903164441.GA1821@thebird.nl> <9a4b1226-6899-6db7-c3c4-4ca11c2f180b@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X3gaHHMYHkYqP6yf" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51967) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bgHmR-0002Iu-Gz for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 16:43:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bgHmN-0003Rn-DE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 16:43:10 -0400 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:37673) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bgHmN-0003Qq-5h for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 16:43:07 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9a4b1226-6899-6db7-c3c4-4ca11c2f180b@openmailbox.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Brendan Tildesley Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --X3gaHHMYHkYqP6yf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 05:19:45AM +1000, Brendan Tildesley wrote: > On 2016-09-04 02:55, David Craven wrote: > >> Today was pretty much an E-mail overload on the ML. In itself amazing = :) > > I agree. If you aren't a full time guix developer it's hard to keep > > up. The only way I can keep up is by marking the emails I'm not > > interested in quickly as read =3DP Just reading all emails is a time > > commitment in itself... > > > I was going to post a patch over several files removing redundant > mkdir-p expressions, >=20 > but decided against it! If you run something like `ack '\(install-file' > -B 7| ack 'mkdir-p' -A 7' >=20 > You can see them, since install-file already contains a mkdir-p. Also It > seems like >=20 > (let ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out")))...) is set in almost every > package definition, >=20 > as if having some symbol for the outputs already might be more efficient?? >=20 If its just one I sometime just use %outputs, but this also only works when the only output is "out". We don't want too much "special magic" in the packaging definitions also. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --X3gaHHMYHkYqP6yf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXyzXHAAoJEPTB05F+rO6TRKEP/3UigFKxWUweoqgLPXJ5HxPi ymjaUfZEEg/fEkNwZXIGJ+9yvOif11LUG0T2j7bKlis6qVupg0QTy+ilaTa1QW46 q5YqP1juVl7tfXa79dgmxip2mUVD7WHMVz01VUft7qx+KnGBFNe+ueKUpycFfYkO jgqV5VPzhe8O8UFGDQmZ/5I4aoeqvXbCKdAqrv/YDHy7MhBa0+s16eKRXQDa/iAn ttnmmVT69GMkYJ+RkwrZBsQsVFQM+9JYX250bN1Jy0uVudJ74Re4EdlFlFS/P+Ru oWXYpUgTML8tVbmoWwajCUxtkD02Qv6v2mH4n/ON/WwMSyl62R+rtNrFu1/XlHKu 7RRxl4b0rQVxEUe5oVweRaLFnsjWr6qKUhyrc/vOUJjg3qPIB0J6UT8dwcrNjfqf ktEwqXGX4sWJ0vc5jIBhMwEi9Ov9XFIuliQ2HvSy3kK0HNY2ie4izIIokrVrVGbx NI0g2xlyISiY6CkjU2uJVk6b89JM5NIgLgTtSYUnO0V3nMqQkyd8rzxDwNhAat53 RmdtI12Ss04lFsIpNOXTKv1fla9nmd9K3S8/6JKTuj4GQeP99BQ48t97f/9S8WM5 0OWHrYZvmDgQZ2WuUgz1eZT3DiEJAzVeL+uYudEoCwZxTMcIQD8fWVPmpO+qYLSd uNZV1ELVycKVhqJXD7vU =3xbM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X3gaHHMYHkYqP6yf--