From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: Add acme-client. Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 12:04:13 +0200 Message-ID: <20160903100413.GA6340@solar> References: <57C9BE93.7090206@goebel-consult.de> <20160902185028.GB31756@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52690) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bg7oG-0000D4-QB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 06:04:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bg7oA-0005oT-Q3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 06:04:23 -0400 Received: from mailrelay1.public.one.com ([91.198.169.124]:58596) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bg7oA-0005oL-Ct for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 06:04:18 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160902185028.GB31756@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Hartmut Goebel On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 02:50:28PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 08:01:55PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote: > > Am 02.09.2016 um 16:49 schrieb Leo Famulari: > > > + (name "acme-client") > > I strongly suggest using a different name, as this is *one* of many > > implementations and it is not the "official" one. > Suggestions? Is there other reasonably widely used software with this name? Our package guidelines say to use the upstream name. Andreas