From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?B?VG9tw6HFoSDEjGVjaA==?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix compiling on CentOS 7. Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 11:53:36 +0200 Message-ID: <20160828095336.uh4mjcdxskkqzjdp@venom> References: <87d1kvpazv.fsf@gnu.org> <20160827065756.kblwxq3gmg63eug2@venom> <87wpj2a9m9.fsf@gmail.com> <87lgziy4qn.fsf@gnu.org> <87bn0diy89.fsf@gnu.org> <20160828081102.grkh52hivbhcf5be@venom> <20160828093444.GH26988@macbook42.flashner.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iscyn4pwthokutzc" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36873) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bdwmc-0002Zt-J0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 05:53:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bdwmY-0003S3-EF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 05:53:41 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160828093444.GH26988@macbook42.flashner.co.il> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org --iscyn4pwthokutzc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:34:44PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: >On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:11:02AM +0200, Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 =C4=8Cech wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 01:33:10AM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote: >> > >> > Florian Paul Schmidt writes: >> > >> > > On 08/27/2016 10:51 AM, Roel Janssen wrote: >> > > >> > > > I don't see a way to apply this patch "on the CentOS side" except = for >> > > > waiting (another two or three years) until they upgrade Automake. >> > > >> > > When packaging guix for CentOS, just add a patch to the source packa= ge >> > > definition.. >> > >> > I do not intend to create an RPM package for CentOS, I am merely trying >> > to do the following: >> > git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/guix.git >> > cd guix >> > ./bootstrap >> > ./configure >> > make >> >> I see, I haven't thought about that... >> >> But, in that case, wouldn't be creating guix RPM package for CentOS even >> more beneficial alternative (making it easy for all CentOS7 users...)? >> >> Best regards, >> >> S_W > >That would require keeping it up-to-date. Actually I think that this particular patch could be replaced by script snippet (untested) in spec: for dir in doc emacs gnu nix; do sed "s@%D%@${dir}@g" "${dir}/local.mk" done Furthermore, it requires usually fix once per release - when user run `guix pull', it becomes irrelevant what is user running (but daemon changes). I must say I'm impressed by the effort to fully maintain CentOS 7 to 2020. If you don't want to go package way (which I think is prefferable) I'm not against the reverting patch anymore.=C2=A0 Best regards, S_W --iscyn4pwthokutzc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXwrSaAAoJEEoj40+gM0NtBHgP/3u0we2w36TyCkqTgaFEpdjB WJ5RyJJ8OX/3rRmfHgouSrHhzvEdi4reqINgKmy+kAlOF1ZtLVlVgm3+ftgTicaV pnrTE1P+B/kTRc0VqtTnDnWilp/nS09RZoxruuFqvOUDZWrdkqQK0WYxxp5unCf4 vVdJ8mxi9Vl/wXmALo0+1NkMUbLnMG4x2dfQDUA1CrNC3pJrq28PwjAT3bI6bUiU Bxqz6DjvD+hotV12JfQPVbleJTmBs304l2BT+td0ouRKNjjMfEcEx5j7NXJSaOlW VUqQkUpLN+7VmQFCwbeEr2A43vog2vBnjl6vZjPtS90qdDxFq8TZzMerSfpL8zV4 jHraC4CmhTUSX3wQbV2P/QskQbLyxWW0l76hwRdd3rlw1X5suQsFpcw65vCY6ove t3vU5NPb/D7UNj/en75sXZE97tVBgWOEFB/D5I2HZ9YRecZWkUHebhCaB/gHiPIp /cZpvYHc2b9gRBGLVpcAhjEKaxhLN5Evm0kfe2P/bNpeOgdGBgM2x68GuLqh7fdP n/V2I9kViOzQoWXKTR5i6HIbyujSZjgjZ5YTDwAHhqGgLyVMEhGqLVGc2ZyUg7FI NuGSdSUlr/GeNJp/ddQwecY9oqAG1hJ7JGB3NLOz6dTjRaMNKA63JHi09LPIUp4/ xriYHFURBTLYbPNhhjUA =HW// -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iscyn4pwthokutzc--